URSA Mini 4.6K vs. 4K Final Camera Review

I’ve been using the 4K for nine months and 4.6K for six. I wanted to do a final review of the two cameras.

My Equipment list
URSA Mini 4.6K: http://amzn.to/2fLxSNh
URSA Mini 4K: http://amzn.to/2fLzRkE
URSA Mini Shoulder Mount: http://amzn.to/2g0T1rT
URSA EVF: http://amzn.to/2eOk3gh
Cfast Cards: http://amzn.to/2fHIrCs

Camera Support
Benro S8 Head: http://amzn.to/2eOf6Ei
Kessler Quick Release: http://amzn.to/2eOvBQI
Edelkrone Slider: http://amzn.to/2eOe5fr
Follow Focus: http://amzn.to/2eOvm8g
Matte Box: http://amzn.to/2fLDreS
Remote Follow Focus: https://www.motiondogs.com/

Zeiss Cinemod: https://www.ducloslenses.com/collections/classiczf2
IR Cut Filter: http://amzn.to/2esiiKl
Variable ND: http://amzn.to/2eOqaRK

H5N: http://amzn.to/2eOuoJ1
NTG 3 Mic: http://amzn.to/2fHISwz


MV Streams says:

This is your best video review yet, I like how your real and let yourself act silly in between 🙂 Funny and great review! Thumbs Up!

Zegeebwah says:

very good thorough review (and funny)

whaTime Ignas Laugalis says:

Great video, I enjoyed most, was your turrets kicking in every few mins

Cadillacula says:

Wait… as of this moment with the latest and greatest updates and what not the 4K cannot shoot 1080p RAW?

Helmut Seisenberger says:

And I appreciate you!

Peter van der Ham says:

You’re funny 😉

Jyri Sariola says:

Thanks for this honest (and funny) review again! Planning to buy the 4.6k. I was first thinking to buy the Sony FS5 but the image of the Ursa just seems sooo much better. All ready have the Prod cam 4k and the Micro cinema cam. You gotta hate them and love them!

Naveed Mughal says:

cock eyed retard

Benton Collins says:

I enjoy and appreciate your videos, but I see that this video has a magenta cast in the upper and lower right corners. (I’m assuming that the background is actually solid grey? ) Did you shoot this on the UM4.6k by chance? I had to go through four different UM4.6k cameras to finally get one that was generally magenta free, but even then I’ll can still get it in the corners with certain lenses past T/f8 or so. The overall magenta cast difference between my first three cameras and the one I finally kept was dramatic. Unfortunately all UM4.6k’s are not created equally. The original magenta issue for me was never about any overall magenta cast that could be corrected in post or with the new firmware in camera, it was about the magenta corners that couldn’t be globally corrected for. Additionally, I also found that the Schneider True Cut 680 filter works wonders in blocking infra red pollution that can be seen in your shirt. That filter lives on my camera, wether I’m using ND filters or not. All that said, I absolutely love my UM4.6k! Keep up the good work!

Stan Arthur says:

Watch this and tell me if the 4K still sucks in low light. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm5Aoahuf24 I’m getting really tired of people spreading that fake news. All you need is a proper lens.

tallguytrav says:

2:25. You should just have that on repeat.

JTEK | The Plug You Need says:

This may be a stupid question; try not to judge!

I just received a small bank loan for either one of these cameras. Getting the 4K, if I were to purchase a XEEN cine lens, would that someone compensate for the lost of quality? Now, I understand (of course) a lens does not increase resolution lol…I’m speaking in terms of image quality. I don’t know how I can go in-depth on that term but help a brotha out!

Chris Burrows says:

Great sound effects. You should get into Foley.

Rajesh Vedantam says:

Enjoy your reviews. Very detailed, thorough yet entertaining!

ResQ says:

haha this was so entertaining, very impressive review 😀

Pradip Kurbah says:

Does the image quality differ if i use EF lenses on a 4.6k

Sonny Brown says:

I wish you showed some examples of some of the things you talk about here.

FrameFury says:

Thanks for the reviews. It’s great to hear as many viewpoints as possible on these cams (I own them as well). Having said that, it’s hard to ignore the asymmetrical magenta cast in your main shot… You might look at RMA’ing your 4.6K for a cleaner sensor.

karimmeg says:

thx my man ! helpful. i have a in mind to order the 4k but im a bit stressed about the fix pattern noise and the dark black hole in high light…. my 2.5 et production 4k had it… i dont want to be tricked again…. what do you think?

Scott Patrick says:

lol lvl 12, keep grinding son!

FinalGrade says:

Thank you for the comparison between each camera. This is exactly what I needed.

smoogles says:

Press 1 to poop.

simon gentry says:

i am interested to hear what YOU recommend for docs. i just tried the Sony FS5 and it sucks in low light – ASA Native 3200

Андрей Федяев says:

Thank you so much for the review! I had a choice between Ursa 4k, Ursa 4.6k and Canon C100MKII. And now I know the right answer! Do not listen to anyone, you have excellent reviews! 🙂 Respect from Siberia man!

Marcelo Tarud says:

ursa 4k or ursa mini 4k? low light and image..

Celso Destefano says:

you’ve got me to sub on the “camera shaken syndrome”! Great video man!

Dave Tee says:


James Blanco says:

Thank you for this review, fantastic!! Keep it up!! Cheers,


Great job man

Matt Black says:

Quite possibly the worse review I’ve ever seen. How you managed to talk for 10 minutes about your feelings and say nothing of interest is almost impressive. THIS IS NOT A REVIEW,

MsMoeb says:

I’m about to invest into either a 4k or a 4,6K for studio shooting. There will be lighting, although would you recommend having the 4,6K because of the low light risks?

simon gentry says:

ty for following up on this!

 Write a comment


Do you like our videos?
Do you want to see more like that?

Please click below to support us on Facebook!